Sunday, May 31, 2015

Japan Warned to Stay Vigilant for "Big One" After Powerful Earthquake

Tokyo:  Seismologists today warned Japan to stay vigilant for the next “Big One” after a powerful 7.8-magnitude earthquake hit off the coast of the quake-prone nation, injuring a dozen people.

Buildings swayed for around a minute in Tokyo and its vicinity Saturday night as the quake struck at a remote spot in the Pacific Ocean around 874 kilometres (542 miles) south of the capital, the US Geological Survey said.



Despite its power, there was no risk of a tsunami as its epicentre was a deep 676 kilometres below the Earth’s surface, the USGS and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said.

12 people were injured, including a 56-year-old man who broke his ribs, but no one was killed, an official of the Tokyo Fire Department and local media said today.


Some 400 people were trapped at the observation decks of Tokyo Tower as its elevatorsstopped for more than one hour.


Runways at Haneda Airport in Tokyo were closed for about 30 minutes, with trains also temporarily halted, while a football match in the city was briefly suspended.


There were no reported anomalies at any of the region’s mothballed nuclear power plants.


A massive undersea quake that hit in March 2011 sent a tsunami barrelling into Japan’s northeast coast, killing thousands of people and sending three reactors into meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant.


The nuclear disaster, the world’s worst since Chernobyl, displaced tens of thousands of people and rendered tracts of land uninhabitable, possibly for decades.


Saturday’s quake was the second sizeable tremor Tokyo has experienced in a week, after a much less powerful – but far shallower – earthquake hit close to the capital on Monday.


Some experts warn recent quakes and volcano eruptions may be signs that areas near the country are entering “an active phase of crustal changes”.


“I can say Japan is in an active stage now,” said Toshiyasu Nagao, head of Earthquake Prediction Research Centre at Tokai University.


“Considering the geographic location of Japan, we can say the current activities are rather normal and it was too quiet” before the 2011 jolt, Nagao told AFP.


“We should be vigilant by knowing that it is no wonder that an earthquake sizeable enough to affect our society can occur anytime in the future,” he said.


Kazuki Koketsu, professor with the Earthquake Research Institute at the University of Tokyo, said the latest tremor was unlikely to be a sign of a potential big jolt in capital, which was devastated by an massive earthquake in 1923.


“But it is important to regard it as an opportunity to prepare for a future quake,” Koketsu told TV Asahi.


Japan sits at the meeting place of four tectonic plates and experiences around 20 percent of the world’s most powerful earthquakes every year.


But rigid building codes and strict enforcement mean even powerful quakes frequently do little damage.


On Friday a volcano in the far south of Japan erupted, spewing a huge column of ash high into the sky and forcing authorities to evacuate the island on which it sits.


The eruption caused no injuries and no damage was reported, but it served as yet another reminder of the volatile geology of the country.


PM Modi Promises Solution to One Rank One Pension Issue, Asks Army to be Patient

New Delhi:  This government will find a solution and implement the One Rank One Pension Scheme, Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised the Army this morning on his monthly radio address Mann ki Baat.

“You have been patient for 40 years, wait for some more time. I promise you we will hold discussions and resolve the issue,” he said. “Is it not true that the issue has remained unresolved for 40 years? Every government before this one, talked about this, but did nothing?”


“I am not talking as the Prime Minister, I wish to address our forces as a man, from the heart,” he said.

This was the second time PM Modi promised action on the issue that had pushed two decorated war veterans to boycott an event attended by Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar last week.  


PM Modi was widely expected to announce it last Monday when he addressed a rally in Mathura in Uttar Pradesh, but he had not.


Wing Commander SD Karnik, a 1971 war veteran, had said he was disillusioned by the non-implementation of the scheme, which is meant to ensure that defence personnel who retire at the same rank and with the same length of service, will get equal pension, irrespective of when they retired.


Mr Parrikar has said the scheme was “was on its way” but he could not promise a date for its implementation.


“Two or three steps remain so can’t give you a specific time,” he had said. What made it more difficult was that it involved various departments. Sources told NDTV that the file is shuttling between the finance and defence ministries.


Six years ago, the Supreme Court had directed the government to implement the scheme. In February, the court gave three more months to the government, saying non implementation by the end of it will amount to contempt of court. The time limit ends in May.


PM Modi Promises Solution to One Rank One Pension Issue, Asks Army to be Patient

New Delhi:  This government will find a solution and implement the One Rank One Pension Scheme, Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised the Army this morning on his monthly radio address Mann ki Baat.

“You have been patient for 40 years, wait for some more time. I promise you we will hold discussions and resolve the issue,” he said. “Is it not true that the issue has remained unresolved for 40 years? Every government before this one, talked about this, but did nothing?”


“I am not talking as the Prime Minister, I wish to address our forces as a man, from the heart,” he said.

This was the second time PM Modi promised action on the issue that had pushed two decorated war veterans to boycott an event attended by Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar last week.  


PM Modi was widely expected to announce it last Monday when he addressed a rally in Mathura in Uttar Pradesh, but he had not.


Wing Commander SD Karnik, a 1971 war veteran, had said he was disillusioned by the non-implementation of the scheme, which is meant to ensure that defence personnel who retire at the same rank and with the same length of service, will get equal pension, irrespective of when they retired.


Mr Parrikar has said the scheme was “was on its way” but he could not promise a date for its implementation.


“Two or three steps remain so can’t give you a specific time,” he had said. What made it more difficult was that it involved various departments. Sources told NDTV that the file is shuttling between the finance and defence ministries.


Six years ago, the Supreme Court had directed the government to implement the scheme. In February, the court gave three more months to the government, saying non implementation by the end of it will amount to contempt of court. The time limit ends in May.


President Pranab Mukherjee Approves Land Ordinance Issued by Government for Third Time

New Delhi:  President Pranab Mukherjee has approved the land ordinance, which was cleared by the Cabinet yesterday for the third time after the government failed to convert it into law during the recently concluded Budget Session of Parliament.

The Union Cabinet, headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, had decided to re-issue the ordinance on Saturday, saying it was necessary for maintaining continuity and providing a framework to compensate people whose land is acquired.


The President has given assent for the re-issuing of the ordinance, official sources said in New Delhi on Sunday.

The ordinance has been issued for the third time and it is the 13th executive order of the NDA government since it came to power in May last year.


The measure was issued for the first time in December last year to amend the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.


The ordinance was replaced by a bill.


While Lok Sabha has passed it with 10 official amendments, the government has not taken it to the Rajya Sabha as it lacks numbers there.


The ordinance was re-issued in March this year and was due to lapse on June 3. To re-issue the ordinance, the government had prorogued Rajya Sabha during the Budget Session.


An amended land acquisition bill is under consideration of a Joint Committee of Parliament.


An IIT Teacher"s View on the Madras Controversy


Let’s try and take the bull by the horns at the risk of being gored. Here, as far as one can gather, is the narrative so far.

A study circle of students at IIT Madras reads B.R. Ambedkar’s classic ‘The Annihilation of Caste’ and distributes pamphlets that reportedly ‘spread hatred’ by condemning not just the caste system but all of Hinduism. An anonymous letter to this effect is sent to the HRD Ministry which forwards the complaint to the IIT authorities. IIT Madras then responds by stating that the students have broken an agreed-upon rule that forbids them to use the name of the institution to “garner support or publicize their activities”. Finally, the political parties enter the ring like brave matadors – some defending freedom of speech on behalf of the students, and others condemning the apparently wholesale castigation of Hinduism by these same students.


Under these piquant circumstances, how do we interpret that basic ‘right to freedom of expression’, ironically guaranteed under a Constitution whose chief architect was B.R. Ambedkar himself? In order to address this conundrum, I would like to first turn to a story attributed to a very great champion of Hinduism indeed – Swami Vivekananda.


Vivekananda is said to have prayed fervently at a shrine to the goddess Bhavani in Srinagar. His devotion so pleased Bhavani that she appeared before him and Vivekananda at once agitatedly related to her the desecration of her temple by past ‘invaders’. He would never have tolerated such an insult, he tells her; he would have laid down his life to protect her! To all of which the cool goddess replies: “But what if this were indeed the case? What is it to you? Do you protect me or do I protect you?”


Self-deprecating and humour-laden, the anecdote shows how Vivekananda’s wise analysis of narrow human enmities still holds lessons for our increasingly cacophonous politics. Taking our cue from it, we might ask: Do our politicians protect the Constitution or does it protect them?


Surely, the latter as much as the former.


Extend this argument now to the students of the Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle. If the political right to protest is sacred, both inside and outside Parliament where so many ‘unacceptable’ statements have been made of late, then so is the individual right to dissent. And here, we must make a further key distinction, especially relevant to university environments, between the concepts of ‘protest’ and ‘dissent’.


Dissent is not to be confused with protest. We protest about particular issues or events – say, price rise or a horrifying rape – but dissent is not necessarily issue-based. Unlike protest, we can’t just ‘stop dissenting’ in the way we can cease to protest if and when we achieve our objectives. Dissent is not so much protest as the mental foundation of protest; it represents the idiom of anti-complacency and democratic self-voicing. That is why the idea of dissent is key to university environments.


To return to Vivekananda’s Goddess here for a moment, we could see her as a potent metaphor for the concepts that a society holds dear – such as democracy or justice or the ‘right to dissent’. As this goddess smartly argues, she does not belong by right to any of the sparring parties who appoint themselves her guardians. ‘Enshrined’ or ‘protected’ by greater guarantees, she belongs to the transcendent collective – to ‘we, the people’.


It is here that the idea of ‘the university’, in its modern avatar, becomes relevant. In its earliest usage in English, back in 1300, the Shorter Oxford Dictionary informs us that a university indicated “the whole entire number, a community regarded collectively… the whole body of teachers engaged at a particular place, in giving and receiving instruction in the higher branches of learning”.


The noun ‘Institute’, as in the IITs, derives on the other hand from the Latin verb for ‘to establish’ and has a relatively modern meaning. The first usage of this word was in 1795 in a post-revolutionary France inspired by the ideals of ‘liberty, fraternity and equality’. An ‘Institute’ is supposed to have a more labour and skills-oriented approach to education and an emphasis on technical specializations. According to the Shorter Oxford again, it designates “a society or organization… to promote some literary, scientific, artistic or educational object”.


What is noteworthy about both the pre-modern idea of the ‘University’ and the post-French Revolution notion of the ‘Institute’ is their collective orientation and their commitment to learning communes where teachers and students are equal partners in intellectual exploration.


A university is ideally a ‘protected’ place where ideas, however radical, can be fearlessly presented and debated. In this sense, dissent can be seen as an attitude of mind allied to the ‘right’ to be sceptical and to sharply question. As a teacher, the classroom is my ‘sacred space’. My personal opinion is that no question can, in principle, be rejected in such a space. The query or hypothesis a student presents may be wildly off, yet it must be dealt with, as far as possible, through sustained reason and cooperative argument.


Our relentless examination systems and rickety infrastructure may, over the years, have worn down our capacity to enrich this basic idea of ‘universal’ questioning, but it must be recognized that the ‘right’ to dissent remains part of the very architecture of a university.


So even if we grant that the students at IIT Madras violated some rules and their privileges had to be ‘temporarily withdrawn’, a far more fundamental principle seems at stake. That principle has been already articulated by IIT Madras in no uncertain terms: “The Institute does not curtail freedom of expression”. Indeed, as a respected site of education, it cannot and must not.


A colleague at IIT Madras makes three sensible points in this connection in an email to me. One, he was out of town when all the brouhaha happened but, truth to tell, he hadn’t even heard of this study group until the recent newspaper reports. Two, this controversy somehow reminds him of the quite different ‘kiss-of-love’ campaign in November 2014 which spilled over into IIT Madras from other campuses with protests outside the campus gates, as in the present case, and then blew over. Three, his ‘hunch’ is that the incessant media attention these days simply escalates tensions. Overall, his perspective, as an observer at close quarters, is that dissent is such a ‘generic’ and integral part of campus-life that it would probably pass unnoticed if the media wasn’t hyper-ventilating.


To my mind, however, the implications could be larger. Some of the most exciting academic debates in our country in the tumultuous 21st century are likely to come from the struggles of large marginalized aggregates. Unless we are prepared to take these forms of social dissent seriously in academia, the rule-bound, top-down routines to which we have become so used to are bound to be violently disrupted.


As Dalits, women, endangered language groups and others seek to insert their perspectives, texts and theories and into the accepted public discourses and academic canons, we will need to rapidly move outside our mental comfort zones. And this process of ’empowerment’ is already well underway.


True, the IIT Madras flashpoint may soon be forgotten but its real significance is that it is yet another wake-up call. Universities and institutes are natural havens where our youth will meet to discuss the excitement, hopes and challenges of the future. If we value that common future, we must protect their freedom to read as they will, to learn, to think and to dissent.


(Critical theorist and writer Rukmini Bhaya Nair is a professor at IIT Delhi. She is the author of several academic books and has been PI of a DST project on ‘Language, Emotion and Culture’. She is currently leading another ICSSR project on ‘The Capabilities Approach to Education: Access, Equity and Quality.’)


Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of NDTV and NDTV does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.


Saturday, May 30, 2015

Top Quality Masks, Anti-UV Glasses for Delhi Traffic Police

New Delhi:  In some good news for Delhi Traffic Police personnel braving the harsh sun and pollution while managing traffic in the city, the department has decided to equip them with standard quality breathing masks and ultraviolet (UV) protected sunglasses.

The first batch of about 200 personnel who man major traffic intersections and rotaries in the city have already been provided with these masks and sunglasses.


Senior officers will review the use of the gear before providing them to all those on field duty.


“We have provided standard quality breathing masks and UV protection sunglasses to the first batch who have to do continuous duty under scorching sun, and dusty weather. The good thing about this anti-UV sunglasses is that it could even be worn over power glasses,” said Special Commissioner (Traffic) Muktesh Chander.

The breathing mask comes with a replaceable filter which can be changed after a specified number of hours.


“This mask will save our personnel from inhaling polluted air and dust particles while performing their duty at busy traffic intersections. We have provided 200 masks and sunglasses to as many personnel in the first phase,” said Joint Commissioner of Police (Traffic) Sandeep Goel.


While rising levels of pollution in the national capital have always been a cause of concern, rising temperatures have put Delhi at high risk of ultraviolet (UV) rays.


According to System of Air Quality and Weather Forecasting Research (SAFAR), the city recorded 8.6 on the UV index on Tuesday while it was 8.2 on Wednesday afternoon.


The 1-4 range on the UV index is considered as no risk, while 4-5 and 5-7 are considered as low and medium risk respectively while 7-10 is classified as high risk range.


While prolonged human exposure to air pollution can lead to chronic respiratory diseases, lung cancer, and acute respiratory infections. Solar UV radiation contact may result in acute and chronic health effects on the skin, eye and immune system.


Sunburn (erythema) is the most commonly known acute effect of excessive UV radiation exposure.



 


Mobile Calls, Hotels to Get Costlier From Tomorrow as Service Tax Increased to 14 Per Cent

New Delhi:  People will have to shell out more from tomorrow while using mobiles, eating out and travelling as the service tax rate goes up to 14 per cent.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in his Budget had proposed to raise service tax from 12.36 per cent (including education cess) to 14 per cent. The proposal takes effect from June 1.


The tax is levied on all services, expect a small negative list.


Some of the key services that will attract higher tax and hence become costlier are: railways, airlines, banking, insurance, advertising, architecture, construction, credit cards, event management and tour operators.

Mobile operators and credit card companies have already started sending messages to subscribers conveying the increase in service tax rate which will have a bearing on the bills.


According to railway ministry officials, fares for First Class and AC classes in passenger trains, besides freight charges, will go up by 0.5 per cent from June 1.


“Currently, 3.7 per cent service tax is levied on train fares for AC Class, First Class and freight. This will go up to 4.2 per cent from June which means the rise is only 0.5 per cent,” the official said. Currently, there is abatement of 70 per cent on passenger services.


Jaitley had proposed to raise the service tax rate to 14 per cent to facilitate a smooth transition to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, which the government wants to roll out from April 2016.


Once implemented, GST will subsume service tax, excise and other local levies.


“To facilitate a smooth transition to levy of tax on services by both the Centre and the States, it is proposed to increase the present rate of service tax plus education cesses from 12.36 per cent to a consolidated rate of 14 per cent,” Jaitley had said in Budget speech.


Education cess, which is levied on service tax, will be subsumed in the service tax rate with effect from June 1.


Although the Budget also proposed a 2 per cent Swachh Bharat cess on selected services, the government is yet to come out with a notification in this regard.


"This Government Will Find Solution to One Rank One Pension Issue," Says PM Modi in "Mann ki Baat": Highlights

New Delhi:  Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the nation on the eighth edition of his radio program ‘Mann Ki Baat’.

Here are the highlights from the PM’s address:



 


  • My fellow citizens the last time I spoke with you all on ‘Mann ki Baat’, Nepal had seen a devastating earthquake. This time we are surrounded by a heat wave.

  • I urge you all to take care of yourselves in this heat. At the same time, take care of the birds & animals around you as well.

  • Board exam results are out. I congratulate those who have passed the exams.

  • Many people told me that your ‘Mann Ki Baat’ before the exams was very helpful. But, the real reason for students’ success is their own hard work.

  • Success and failure are a part of life. We can learn a lot from failure as well.

  • It’s important that you realise your potential, capabilities and choose your path based on that.

  • I have always wanted to work for the poor. We think of new initiatives, we take feedback on initiatives.

  • Another thing that gives me a lot of joy is the Kisan TV Channel (launched a few days ago).

  • Kisan TV channel is a channel where both the teacher and the student are farmers.

  • We have launched 3 programs to ensure social security for the people of our nation, wherein you can get an insurance of Rs 2 lakh by paying just 1 rupee a month (Rs 12 per annum). This will greatly benefit the poor.

  • Kisan channel is important for me, I see a future through kisaan channel, it’s an open university for agriculture & irrigation.

  • I would like to let the fishermen know that the Kisan channel also has information related to fishing & animal husbandry. You will benefit from it.

  • Along with agriculture, irrigation and animal husbandry can also contribute to economic growth of the country.

  • I would like you all to be aware that 21st June has a new identity for the world – We will see the 1st International Day of Yoga.

  • Could you ever imagine that Yoga will connect the world in this manner.

  • To our brave army personnel and ex-servicemen… For 40 years the question of One Rank One Pension has been persisting. Not much has happened so far. I assure you that this Government, and I repeat, this Government will give the solution to One Rank One Pension.

  • During holiday season many of you would have gone to places, many would be planning to do so now. I don’t know if you write a diary but you must write down your experiences.

  • You can share your experiences with me. Do so using #IncredibleIndia. Share photos, your experiences etc. I will share your experiences with others as well.

"This Government Will Find Solution to One Rank One Pension Issue," Says PM Modi in "Mann ki Baat": Highlights

New Delhi:  Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the nation on the eighth edition of his radio program ‘Mann Ki Baat’.

Here are the highlights from the PM’s address:



 


  • My fellow citizens the last time I spoke with you all on ‘Mann ki Baat’, Nepal had seen a devastating earthquake. This time we are surrounded by a heat wave.

  • I urge you all to take care of yourselves in this heat. At the same time, take care of the birds & animals around you as well.

  • Board exam results are out. I congratulate those who have passed the exams.

  • Many people told me that your ‘Mann Ki Baat’ before the exams was very helpful. But, the real reason for students’ success is their own hard work.

  • Success and failure are a part of life. We can learn a lot from failure as well.

  • It’s important that you realise your potential, capabilities and choose your path based on that.

  • I have always wanted to work for the poor. We think of new initiatives, we take feedback on initiatives.

  • Another thing that gives me a lot of joy is the Kisan TV Channel (launched a few days ago).

  • Kisan TV channel is a channel where both the teacher and the student are farmers.

  • We have launched 3 programs to ensure social security for the people of our nation, wherein you can get an insurance of Rs 2 lakh by paying just 1 rupee a month (Rs 12 per annum). This will greatly benefit the poor.

  • Kisan channel is important for me, I see a future through kisaan channel, it’s an open university for agriculture & irrigation.

  • I would like to let the fishermen know that the Kisan channel also has information related to fishing & animal husbandry. You will benefit from it.

  • Along with agriculture, irrigation and animal husbandry can also contribute to economic growth of the country.

  • I would like you all to be aware that 21st June has a new identity for the world – We will see the 1st International Day of Yoga.

  • Could you ever imagine that Yoga will connect the world in this manner.

Court Pulls Up Delhi Government, Traffic Police for Congestion on Roads

New Delhi:  The Delhi High Court has taken strong exception to the city government, traffic police and DDA not complying with its order on decongesting traffic on the busy single-lane flyover at Rao Tula Ram Marg connecting the airport, saying money is “going down the drain”.

“You (government and other authorities) had to comply with our order and directions, but you have not done so,” a bench of justices BD Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva said.


“It is money going down the drain, let me tell you this,” Justice Sachdeva also remarked with respect to work the Public Works Department (PWD) claimed to have done to decongest traffic.



PWD in response said it had already showed the bench, by way of presentation and maps, the measures it intends to take, like removing encroachments from the alternative roads and preventing parking on them, to decongest traffic.

It said that subsequent to it apprising the court about these measures, PWD was allowed to go on with its project of building a three-lane flyover from Munirka till Army Research and Referral Hospital on the Outer Ring Road, parallel to the existing Rao Tula Ram flyover.


The residents of Vasant Vihar, who have filed an application alleging “abject failure” on the part of PWD to comply with court directions, contended that encroachments are still present on the Nelson Mandela Marg junction as well as DDA bypass road.


They have sought that till PWD and other authorities ensure that traffic is de-congested, they be not allowed to go ahead with their flyover project.


The bench, however, remarked that no useful discussion could be had without having a map of the area and listed the matter for further hearing on September 9.


It also issued notice to the city government and other authorities and asked them to file status reports in response to the contentions made in a fresh application moved by residents of Vasant Vihar.


In their application, the Vasant Vihar residents have alleged that the authorities have failed to comply with the court’s October 28, 2014 directions to decongest traffic in the area.


The court had said that “alternative measures discussed for decongesting traffic to and from the airport, particularly, at the T-junction joining Nelson Mandela Marg and the Outer Ring Road as also the entry point after Ryan International School from Mehrauli Mahipalpur Road to the DDA road, shall be made operational within two weeks”.


It had said the authorities shall make an endeavour to make operational every route they intend to use during diversion of traffic while building the flyover.


The application was filed by residents of Vasant Vihar in their main plea challenging PWD’s decision to build a three-lane flyover parallel to the single-lane flyover at Rao Tula Ram Marg.


Vasant Vihar residents associations, in their main plea, have sought that a six-lane flyover be built in the same location by demolishing the existing one at Rao Tula Ram Marg.


Reaffirm Commitment to Reduce Tobacco Consumption: Prime Minister Narendra Modi

New Delhi:  Prime Minister Narendra Modi today said World No Tobacco Day was a day to “reaffirm our commitment” to reduce the menace of tobacco consumption.

He tweeted:



The prime minister added that the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) “focus on stopping illicit trade of tobacco products is a laudatory effort that will help in minimising tobacco consumption”.


According to the WHO, tobacco causes over five million deaths worldwide which is likely to increase to 8.4 million if the situation is not brought under control.


May 31 is observed as World No Tobacco Day.


Building of Islands Is Debated, but China and U.S. Skirt Conflict at Talks

Singapore:  It was an unexpectedly direct exchange: With nearly every significant Asian defense official gathered in a single room, a senior Chinese military officer on Saturday defended his country’s island-building spree in the South China Sea and rebuked Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter for saying it threatened the region’s stability.

If anything, “the region has been peaceful and stable just because of China’s great restraint,” said Senior Col. Zhou Bo, the Chinese officer.


Yet a few moments later, away from the crowd and cameras, Zhou’s defiant tone gave way to a seemingly more subtle appreciation of the complex relationship that binds the United States and China together and, at the same time, pushes them apart. The speech by Carter that prompted his comments had “balance,” Zhou said in a brief interview.

“We do not disagree on all things,” he added, before rushing off to huddle with fellow Chinese officers at the conference.


After a week of public rancor over China’s rush to build artificial islands on reefs, rocks and atolls in the disputed waters of the South China Sea, the first full day of the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual security meeting in Singapore that attracts almost every major and minor player in Asia, gave both sides the chance to lower the temperature.


Although Carter did not hold any formal meetings with Chinese officials, lower-ranking U.S. officials did, and it was apparent that they effectively agreed to disagree on what constitutes sovereign Chinese territory for the time being. But U.S. officials made it clear that the dispute would not hinder nascent military cooperation with China or threaten the deep economic ties that are the bedrock of Asia’s stability and prosperity.


Adm. Harry Harris, the new chief of U.S. forces in the Pacific, summed it up succinctly in a briefing with reporters at the end of the day: “Conflict is bad for business.”


The dispute over the South China Sea has festered for decades with China, Vietnam, the Philippines and a handful of other countries all making overlapping claims to a stretch of ocean rich with natural gas and other resources. While this issue simmered in the background for a long time, disputes have escalated in recent years, most notably when China placed an oil rig near Vietnam last year, but also with skirmishes between naval forces and fishing boats from the various claimants.


Those tensions have heightened as the scope of the Chinese building spree became apparent – U.S. officials say 2,000 acres of land were added in the past 18 months – and a pair of mechanized artillery pieces were briefly spotted on two of the islands, raising fears that China was moving to back up its claims to the new islands with military force.


Chinese forces also this month ordered a U.S. surveillance plane to leave the skies over Fiery Cross Reef, where China has built an island with a landing strip. The U.S. aircraft did not comply.


Then last week China released a document outlining a strategic vision for its navy to project force beyond its coastal waters into the open oceans. Western officials said the release appeared timed to challenge participants at the conference.


Other countries have also built outposts in the South China Sea. But the construction was done before 2002, when China and nine Southeast Asian nations signed a nonbinding agreement to “exercise self-restraint” and refrain from trying to inhabit any land features that were uninhabited at that time. And the pre-2002 construction was never done at the pace and on the scale of China’s recent land reclamation efforts.


Carter, whose speech opened the day, reiterated a call he made earlier in the week for China to halt the construction, saying that U.S. warships and military aircraft would continue to operate in the area, which the United States still considered to be international waters, not Chinese territory. He also listed numerous weaponry that the United States could bring to bear in Asia – though he did not directly link any of it to China – and unveiled a new U.S. effort to help China’s neighbors build up their naval capabilities.


But he balanced his tough talk with entreaties for China to work with its neighbors and the United States to ensure stability in the region, saying that through cooperation “everybody wins.”


He also sought to assuage Chinese fears that the United States was simply using the dispute over the sea to keep China in check. The United States expected countries like China to broaden the scope of their interests as they grew more powerful, and it was ready to work with them to keep the peace, he said.


The United States “has never aimed to hold any nation back or push any country down,” he said.


Carter also cited areas where the U.S. and Chinese militaries are already cooperating, and new initiatives, such as a measure the two sides are working on that would help prevent dangerous air-to-air encounters between military aircraft.


The official Chinese response was to come Sunday when Adm. Sun Jianguo, the deputy chief of the general staff of the People’s Liberation Army, addresses the conference. U.S., European and Asian officials here said they expected blustery rhetoric, and that had little expectation that the Chinese would suddenly halt their effort to construct new territory in the South China Sea.


Zhou may have provided a preview on Saturday during the question-and-answer period that followed Carter’s speech.


After calling Carter’s criticism groundless, he said that freedom of navigation in the South China Sea was not a problem because it was never really free, and then concluded with a loaded question. “The U.S. has taken some measures, such as harsh criticism toward China, and military reconnaissance activities, your military threat,” he said. “Do these measures help to resolve the dispute in the South China Sea and maintain peace and stability?”


The U.S. answer was that its military has always flown and sailed in international airspace and water, and that it is China that is trying to alter the facts on the ground, not the United States.


But neither side for now appears willing to do much more than demand the other stop.


In the meantime, U.S. officials said they would continue to build the military capacity of allies in the region, and forge closer ties with former adversaries like Vietnam, so they too could benefit from U.S. military assistance. Over time, the hope is that stronger neighbors backed by the United States would serve as a deterrent to China.


Sen. John McCain, who led a Congressional delegation to the conference, told reporters that he planned to introduce legislation next week to lift parts of an embargo on sending weapons to Vietnam.


U.S. allies, though, did not appear entirely convinced that the United States had a long-term plan, or that it would back up its talk about freedom of navigation and the need to respect international laws with action.


“If we leave any unlawful situation unattended, order will soon turn to disorder, and peace and stability will collapse,” Gen Nakatani, the defense minister of Japan, told the forum. “I hope and expect all the countries, including China, to behave as a responsible power.”


But few, if anyone, seemed willing to see order enforced at the risk of war. “This has the potential to escalate into one of the deadliest conflicts of our time, if not history,” said Hishammuddin Hussein, the defense minister of Malaysia. “Inflamed rhetoric does not do any nation any good.”



 


© 2015, The New York Times News Service